Introduction to Property Law

SIGN UP Now
to get your Discount

Law Essay Help Writing Services UK

We offer you the best available law essay writing service UK by qualified & experienced professionals to meet your law essay writing assistance requirements at feasible and pocket-friendly prices.

Place An Order
To Get 40% Discount

get a quote

10 YEARS

EXPERIENCE

Your Law Essays Are Our Specialty

At Law Essay Writer, we consider it our responsibility to provide you with the best available and most affordable law essay writing assistance service UK. Our customers have been delighted with the quality of work which our British essay writers painstakingly deliver to them. We make sure that all instructions and guidelines are thoroughly adhered to and submissions are made well before deadlines, allowing our customers to have ample time to review our work. The mission of our best essay writing service is to guarantee 100% customer satisfaction.

Order Now

To Get a quote

0203-034-0790

Meet Your Deadlines Well Before They Arrive Because We Will Always Deliver Quality Work On-Time And At Affordable Prices.

GET LAW HELP FROM OUR TOP ESSAY WRITING SERVICE

Best Custom Essay Writing Service

We bring you cheap essay writing and easy to buy essay assistance. We have been supporting students to meet their academic goals for over a decade now. All our college essay writers are native English speakers who have qualified from reputable institutes of the UK. Our services are rated as the best by the many customers whom we have served in the past and are currently serving till today. This is due to our unwavering policy to not compromise on delivering work of the highest quality.

100% Original & Unique Content

Qualified Law Essay Writers

Timely Deliveries Before Due Dates

Law Academic Writing Help Services

Over the years of our operations in the industry, we have developed expertise on various forms of UK essays writing help services. We continue to grow and move ahead with every order delivered.

-

LAW ESSAY WRITING SERVICE

Our work delivers brilliance with a result oriented approach. Remarkable custom essay writing help for students in UK.

-

LAW ASSIGNMNET WRITING SERVICE

Sit back & relax while we provide you with exactly what you wanted. All insturctions and guideliens are thoroughly followed.

-

LAW DISSERTATION WRITING SERVICE

Authentic papers with comprehensive command over the subject of discussion. Every word meticulously selected to guarantee perfection.

Don’t Let Your Writing Troubles Bother You!
Ask For Our Assistance To Get Them Done On-Time – Call Us Now!

-

Professional Law Writers

Our Distinctive Service Qualities Make Us Your Best Choice

We ensure that each and every order is completed to a polished finesse thanks to the vast and versatile abilities of our online essay writers. Our features are unparalleled across the industry. We have successfully managed to never let-down our clients before, and do not intend to start now. We have always supplied expertly written, extensively researched, and thoroughly proofread products. Our major qualities include;-

Experienced & Qualified Writers


89%

On-time Delivery


80%

Affordable Prices


76%

Live Chat

9540

Projects Done

80%

Retention

8520

Satisfied Students

Jeniffer Burns
MBA Student

“Brilliantly done! I need more form your services, as my results show how well you deliver for students and their needs.”

Jamie Sykes-
CMA Student

“I am lost for words to describe how pleased I am to have opted for their assignment writing help services. They made my instructor go WOW at me!”

Millie Gordon-

PhD Student

“Alas! I am done with my course…yippee!!! This is a shout out to Law Essay Writers for making it possible for me at so much ease and comfort by my side.”

We can Deliver 100% Plagiarism Free Work On Any Topic of Law. Call Now!

Order Now

Contact Us

You can contact our customer representatives who are available round the clock to offer 24/7 assistance for your queries through live chat, email: , or simply giving us a bell on .

Call Us

Email Us

Chat With Our Experts
Live Chat

Live Chat

100% Secure Payment With




Get Social With Us

Call Now:

Protected by Copyscape

© 2018. All Rights Reserved.

Signup Now!

*Terms & Conditions Apply

  • Fair Use Policy
  • Help Centre
  • Loading…
  • Sign In

LawTeacher logo

LawTeacher
The law essay professionals
0115 966 7966
Today’s Opening Times 10:00 – 20:00 (BST)


Print

Reference this

This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Introduction to Property Law

This particular case involves the transfer of the right to land. Clarke, S. & Greer, S. (2008, 72) state that although the owner of the freehold is generally free to transfer his or her land, English property law requires an element of formality. Much like a property auction, Whiteknights Properties Ltd (WP Ltd) would be most interested in taking the highest offer. However, the dispute between Mr Yellow, Mr Patel and WP Ltd is to whether this offer had be formally accepted, hence forming a binding contract. The premise of the question is to understand whether WP Ltd should deal only with Mr Yellow, or whether they have to freedom to later decline his offer and accept a larger offer from Mr. Patel. Further more, the case should investigate whether Mr Yellow has any claims against WP Ltd.

The transfer of title is usually a four stage conveyance process; negotiation and agreement, formation and exchange of contract, transfer or conveyance of the legal estate and registration. Each of these stages is legally distinct and an important process which must be closely linked to the rules of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, section 2. This act states that the contracts for the sale or disposition of law must be in writing and contained or referring to one master document. The case between Mr. Yellow and WP Ltd. clearly does not show any binding paper contract, but only a hand shake. On the other hand, Keenan, D. & Riches, S. (2005, 250) explains that an acceptance may take any form, either orally or in writing, with the only non valid exception being silence.

However, we could argue that Mr. Yellow was only paying for the privilege and not actually placing a deposit on the property in the agreement to transfer the freehold of a property. In essence, Mr. Yellow was only commencing in the first stage where Clarke & Greer (2008, 73) describes that if the buyer decides, in principle, to buy the property that it would result in an agreement to buy the land ‘subject to contract’, where the agreement would not be legally binding. Therefore, either party would be able to withdraw.

The 2003 Pitt vs. PHH Asset management Ltd. case is a good comparison to this case where Mr. Pitt (the original bidder) and Miss Buckle (the competing bidder) placed competing bids. However, much like the case between Mr. Yellow and Mr. Patel, Miss Buckle increased her bid, making PHH Asset Management Ltd withdraw its acceptance with of Mr. Pitt. He threaten to sue for an injunction, to compel transfer of the property to him which resulted in PHH agreeing to sell him the property, not considering any further offers which is know as a ‘lock down agreement’. However, PHH did decide to sell to the competitor which resulted in Mr. Pitt suing.

Clarke & Greer (2008, 74) explains a process know as gazumping being where a higher offer on a property on which a sale price has already been agreed, but for which agreement no binding contract is yet in place. The key word in this definition is ‘binding’, and therefore to identify whether WP Ltd. should have dealt solely with Mr. Yellow, will depend on whether the £250 privilege was a contract which is binding. In this case there was a ‘lock out agreement’ where no other offers should have been considered, and furthermore Mr. Yellow had shown his willingness by paying for this lock-out agreement.

On balance, it is seen that WP Ltd. should have dealt solely with Mr. Yellow as there was a monetary transaction, which in itself binds a contract showing that both sides were serious. Therefore, WP Ltd. should have not made this agreement, if they were expecting to later receive a higher bid.

Therefore, we must identify that after WP Ltd. did to sell the Mr Patel, whether Mr. Yellow would have the right to claim against WP Ltd. In the case between Pitt vs. PHH Asset management Ltd, Mr. Pitt did sue PHH, and in both cases Mr. Yellow and Mr. Pitt did show that they were serious with going ahead with the transaction. Mr. Yellow, who is self employed was willing to spend money on accountancy fee in order to buy this property, which emphasises his confidence in going ahead with his purchase and should claim because of the risk of damage being made.

MacMillan, C (1993, 392) states that in the similar case between Mr. Pitt and PHH, the court had rejected all arguments that PHH made, including it being section 2 of the Law or Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. In the successful case for Mr. Pitt, Mr. Yellow should also have a similar and viable case as he had actually paid for the privilege, which is an binding in itself, according to the basics of contract law as describe earlier by Keenan, D. & Riches, S. (2005, 250). This oral contract, which therefore should be viable to override the Law of Property Act 1989 which states that it should be in writing and signed by both parties. If it was not a binding agreement for lock out then the privilege agreement should not have gone ahead and this should have been understood by both party’s.

On balance this case has been made clear, with the supporting comparison case of Pitt vs. PHH Ltd. that the court should reject any arguments by Whiteknights Ltd. should Mr. Yellow take this to court. WP Ltd. should have declined the agreement for the privilege should they have be willing to accept higher offers, and as a result, could case damages to Mr. Yellow.


Cite This Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

  • OSCOLA
  • APA
  • MLA
  • MLA-7
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Wikipedia


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.


Reference Copied to Clipboard.